Project Outputs

News

Prof. Dan Miodownik discusses the results of the survey and the topic of the elections in Jerusalem
 
In Haaretz newspaper: an article on the results of the survey
 
An article about the survey results in JPost
 
Noam Brenner presents some of the survey results at the IPCRI organization's conference on "Recent developments in Jerusalem"
 
Noam Brenner is interviewed for an article on the Media Line site about the elections in Jerusalem
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Policy Papers

Infrastructure in Jerusalem

Political Representation in Jerusalem

Safety and Security in Jerusalem

Youth and Education in Jerusalem

Gender in Jerusalem

Survey Report

Abstract

What, Why and How?

This public opinion survey covers different issues of life in Jerusalem of its Israeli and Palestinian residents. It surveys their expressions about local needs, who they view as their local leadership, their social attitudes and ways of communication. It also explores perceptions of violence, life satisfaction and also questions about the future of Jerusalem and municipal elections. This survey is a part of a larger peacebuilding initiative in Jerusalem called “Building Visions for the Future of Jerusalem: A Bottom-Up Approach”. As such, the survey is one of a few ways to collect and give voice to the residents’ needs and perceptions regarding their life in Jerusalem. Its final objectives are to to better understand the foundations for cooperation between the two populations in this contested city, in order to assist in improving their well-being. The survey was conducted differently in each part of the city. In East Jerusalem, respondents (N=612) were interviewed face-to-face by PCPO, an experienced Palestinian survey firm under the supervision of Dr. Nabil Kukali. In West Jerusalem, respondents (N=596) were recruited by “I-panel” and “Midgam”, two of Israel’s largest opt-in internet survey firms. The Surveys were fielded, and responses were collected during January 2018. We are confident that these twodifferent means of data gathering, which is made necessary by the political reality on the ground, are nonetheless commensurate and comparable.

Jerusalem Survey 2018 Report (Final Edition)

Satisfaction from life

Life in Jerusalem

Life in My neighborhood

Community Leadership

Local Communication

Violence in the Neighborhood

The Future of Jerusalem

Municipal Elections

Action Evaluation Report

During the community development process in the first stage the groups engaged in an action evaluation process. In this process participants are asked to point on WHAT is important to them? WHY is it important to them? And How they plan to move forward? The conclusion of this process provides them with a concrete action plan for carry out their vision. Together with the survey results we create and example of how an common vision and action plan on specific issue can look like. Here are the aggregated data with an action plan.

7th_pic

8th_pic